Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., and Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(8):664-687.
Context:
The context for this study is Language Acquisition through Science Education in Rural
Schools (LASERS), a National Science Foundation–funded Local Systemic Change project in
central California that prepares experienced teachers to provide inquiry science instruction to
Latino students learning English as a second language. The science–language integration rubric
was developed to provide a conceptual framework for teacher staff development activities and to
gauge changes in teachers’ beliefs and practice.
Research questions:
(a) How do teachers conceive of science language integration? and (b)
What are the cognitive demands that underlie the development of teacher expertise in domain
integration?
Methods:
Interviews were conducted with 24 first- through sixth-grade teachers (21 female, 3 male)
who participated in the LASERS summer school academy in 1998. The majority of the 24 teachers
(19 of 24) had more than 3 years of teaching experience. The sample includes teachers with
differing levels of participation in the LASERS project and a range of teaching experience.
Therefore, they represent a range of perspectives on language-science integration.
The literature on curriculum domain integration, the development of expertise in
teaching, and cognitive complexity are used as a framework for a rubric that describes science–
language integration as a continuum from isolated domain-specific instruction to fully-integrated
synergistic instruction with the emphasis on commonalties in structure and process across
domains.
The view of integration presented in this article is based on Huntley’s definition of synergistic
integration. Effective language instruction enhances the learning of science concepts, and
effective science inquiry instruction enhances language development and promotes the
development of higher-order thinking skills. This approach aligns with work on the integration
of reading and writing with science instruction
In viewing the teaching of science and language as a synergistic process, we support the view
of bilingual educators such as Cummins (1994) and Met (1994), who argue that the teaching of
English and subject matter content should be so integrated that "all content teachers are also
teachers of language" (Cummins, 1994, p. 42) and "view every content lesson as a language
lesson" (Met, 1994, p. 161). There is currently little information available, however, on successful
approaches to preparing teachers to teach inquiry science to second language learners (Lee &
Fradd, 1998).
This evolution of teacher understanding could be characterized as a shift from "knowing
that" to "knowing how" (Dreyfus & Dreyfus, 1986; Kuhn, 1970; Polanyi, 1958). "Knowing that"
understanding is characterized by a rule-governed, theoretical orientation, whereas "knowing
how" is the flexible application of principles in practice.
Dreyfus framework: novice, advanced beginner, competent, proficient, expert
Conclusions
The traditional approach to educating English language learners, which separates the
teaching of language from the teaching of science content, presents an unnecessary obstacle to the
academic progress of language minority students.
The findings of this report suggest the need to rethink staff development activities and science
teacher education. The artificial and rigid distinctions between the role of science teacher and
language teacher must be broken down.
The critical point is that
language processes can be used to promote understanding of content across all subject matter
domains, and that language use should be contextualized in authentic and concrete activity. In
states such as California, where language minority students represent a significant percentage of
the school-age population, methods of English language development should be integrated into all
elementary and secondary subject matter methods classes and staff development programs.
Integrated instruction will assist language minority students in mastering the English language
and simultaneously improve their achievement in academic subjects.
See:
Huntley, M.A. (1998). Design and implementation of a framework for defining integrated
mathematics and science education. School Science and Mathematics, 98, 320–327.
No comments:
Post a Comment